There was recently a couple of good reasons , with friends about the character Martin Blumenau discussed. Were mainly the relevant inputs and "questions" from the outside up to me, and I have always taken an outsider. Let me explain - and quite by chance justament especially now that he himself also me and our new 80-year project are recorded. In a way, So this is the replica.
Blumenau has always been a scratching post, a really nasty guy, a classic case of "thorn in the flesh" - and for many. It is difficult for many up to him, and even harder to get along with him. Even with "colleagues" (Karl curse) or long-time friends (Walter Gröbchen) had recently been unbelievable, because even very public opinion battles. Though I did for more than ten years and know him again meet, opens up I am still not entirely sure whether Martin Blumenau more character or person.
In the former case, and that I will believe firmly until (he) prove me wrong, He is one of the most important contemporary at all. My position in discussions about the person then this is Blumenau: What has he unpacks, method. As a figure he is a martyr to his own idea. He may grumble and polemics, his provocative and challenging - but in exactly this form of immense importance.
one hand, because he FM4 course a great voice at his disposal, that his "opinion" and multiplied it gives a tremendous value. Second, and rather, but because it is always wider benefit of the "thing" is: What Blumenau that is most consistently make is to reclaim the discourse.
kindly quarrel! If I insult you: Scolds back! And kindly do it decently, not half-heartedly! It's not really about personal insults (although they are sometimes part of the method) - it's about being able to speak his mind and to be allowed. And much more concerned, within such - to do something very important discourse - often emotional: to think. You should be able to justify his opinion well, you should be able to stand behind his opinion. In order to give the necessary weight of this challenge is soft caress and consensual thinking (which would correspond more to me) sometimes the wrong approach. It needed a Blumenau.
His "game" takes place here on the meta-level and affords it certainly mistakes. He insists on education, knowledge of history, facts and loyalty - but it takes too lightly in the purchase, to put itself on accuracy is not too much value. That's my name in the current article first Tschürtz Martin (and I refuse to believe that he did not know better) and he moved the Bravo Hits in the 80s. Even the method could be, I argue here, however apologetically that the speed of his medium (specifically, the daily journal) also calls for sacrifices - such as Speed and Schlampigkeitsfehler. I myself was a journalist, I have myself and just admit today to how hard it is, an accurate and daily to write blog.
And even if it sometimes does not meet quality criteria equivalent to some critical reader:
Martin Blumenau provides conversation - which also proves this article. Precisely this also brings her daily journal. He is an agenda setter. He says that's being talked about. And this role he takes very seriously. The objective level, his very own, personal opinions are ultimately secondary. His goal, he has achieved, by the people on the screen, will make contradictory.
Ultimately it points to the fact that discourse ability (in the personal sense) and freedom (the global) are two things that are not be overestimated. They are the breeding ground for progress, for further development. we do not discuss (or it is harder for us or even forbidden), we degenerate as people and society more quickly than we would like. It is a central task of the journalist, every day on this one - insist on a fundamental right and to prove his importance - his very own. The Internet helps us immensely (Widerspruch! discussion!) - So does the format consistent with the theory.
I want this, my Blumenau-image to believe and therefore give the "free radicals" the space it needs. His articles sometimes reap my consent, and sometimes they cause a shake of the head, usually they make me . Think Everything as it should be and wanted.
There should be absolutely no pattern in this Blumenau devoted fans - it would contradict the principle. Simply: Would all this wrong and Blumenau intentions completely different - it is a big disappointment and it would be a lot more would be called into question. But that's another story, as well as my personal position on "Death To The 80s".
0 comments:
Post a Comment